IAS 16: Property,
plant and equipment
Ø
Definition
Ø
Initial Measurement
Ø
Subsequent Measurement
1.
Cost
2.
Revaluation
Ø
Subsequent expenditure
Ø
Depreciation
Ø
Derecognition
Ø
Disclosure
Definition: IAS 16 defines property, plant and
equipment as tangible items that:
• 'are held for use in the production or supply of goods
or services, for rental to others, or for administrative purposes
• are expected to be used during more than one period' and
on profit over more than one accounting period.
Tangible items have physical substance and can be touched
and used continuously in the company’s activities to provide access to economic
benefits. Common examples of PPE are land and buildings, plant and machinery,
motor vehicles, and fixtures and fittings.
IAS will not be applied to Biological assets and Mineral
rights and reserves.
Initial recognition: An item of property, plant and
equipment should be recognised as an asset when:
• It is probable that the asset's future economic benefits
will flow to the entity.
• The cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
For recognition:
Asset Dr: xxx
Cash Cr: xx
Property, plant and equipment should initially be measured
at its cost. Cost is not simply the purchase price of the asset. According to
IAS 16, this comprises:
• Purchase costs, including import duties and non-refundable
purchase taxes (for example, non-refundable value added tax: however, purchase
taxes are not included in cost if they are refundable to the entity).
• Costs that are directly attributable to bringing the asset
to the necessary location and condition, including:
¾
Professional fees (for example, the fees of
architects or surveyors, and legal costs)
¾
Costs of site preparation (getting a site ready
for installation; for example, the costs of levelling a factory floor before
new machinery is installed)
¾
Installation costs
¾
Costs of testing the asset (e.g. the costs of
safety test flights for a new aeroplane or cost of production runs during the
testing period).
¾
Freight charges
Where the asset has been constructed by the entity, rather
than purchased from an external supplier, the cost should also include the
employee costs that directly relate to the construction and production overhead
costs, but not administration and general overhead costs.
• For self-constructed assets (non-current assets that are
constructed by the entity itself):
¾
Internal profits and abnormal costs should be
excluded from cost
¾
Administrative expenses and other similar
overheads should be excluded from cost
¾
Interest costs incurred in the course of
construction might be included, in accordance with IAS 23 Borrowing
costs.
Costs of testing an asset: Costs of testing an asset
to see whether it is functioning properly for its intended use are
capitalised. Items might be produced when testing a production facility. In
this case the testing cost capitalised is after deducting the net
proceeds from the sale of these items.
Dismantling costs: When a company acquires an asset
it may have an obligation to dismantle the asset and restore the site
once the asset reaches the end of its life. The obligation must be included
in the cost of the asset, at the time that the asset is first recognised.
For example, a company that builds an oil rig in the sea may
have an obligation to restore any damage to the sea-bed once it has finished
drilling for oil. A cost for future site restoration work should be included in
the cost of the oil rig, when the rig is initially recognised as an asset: this
cost should be the present value of the estimated future costs. As a part of
the cost of the asset, it will then be depreciated over the asset’s life.
This treatment ensures that the restoration costs are
matched to the associated income earned from the rig during the rig’s useful
life. (Unless the future restoration costs are capitalised and depreciated, the
cost would eventually have to be accounted for as a ‘one-off’ item of expense
at the end of the asset’s life. This would be inconsistent with the accruals
concept of accounting.)
Which cost to capitalise in the Initial cost of
recognition?
List Price
|
xxx
|
Less: Trade Discount
|
(xxx)
|
Add: Freight charges
|
xxx
|
Add: Import duties
|
xxx
|
Add: Dismantling cost
|
xxx
|
Add: Installation cost
|
xxx
|
Add: Pre production testing
|
xxx
|
Add: Handling cost
|
xxx
|
Example: Entity H has incurred the following costs
prior to bringing a machine into full production:
|
$
|
Purchase price before trade rebate and tax
|
12,200
|
Trade rebate
|
600
|
Refundable purchase taxes
|
1,200
|
Architects’ fees
|
700
|
Installation costs
|
100
|
Operating losses prior to achieving planned performance
|
250
|
Required: Calculate the amount at which the machine
should be stated in the accounting records of Entity H in accordance
with IAS 16.
Answer: The cost of the machine should be stated in
the statement of financial position as:
|
$
|
Purchase price less trade rebate (12,200 – 600)
|
11,600
|
Architects’ fees
|
700
|
Installation costs
|
100
|
Total cost
|
12,400
|
IAS 16 says that the following costs should never be
capitalised:
• Administration and general overheads
• Abnormal costs (repairs, wastage, idle time)
• Costs incurred after the asset is physically ready for use
(unless these costs increase the economic benefits the asset brings)
• Costs incurred in the initial operating period (such as
initial operating losses and any further costs incurred before a machine is
used at its full capacity).
• Costs of opening a new facility, introducing a new product
(including advertising and promotional costs) and conducting business in a new
location or with a new class of customer (including training costs).
• Costs of relocating/reorganising an entity’s operations.
• Start up and similar pre-production cost.
All of these costs will be recognised as an expense in
Profit and loss statement.
Note: All exchange of Property plant and equipment are
measured at fair value including exchange of similar assets unless exchange
transaction lacks commercial substance or fair value of assets received cannot
be measured reliably.
Subsequent measurement/Measurement after initial
recognition: IAS 16 allows a choice between:
• The cost model
• The revaluation model.
The cost model: When the cost model is used, the
depreciation of the asset is based on its cost, and the asset is carried in the
statement of financial position at cost minus accumulated depreciation and any
accumulated impairment.
Impairment:
Dr. Expenses
Cr. Property, plant and equipment
Impairment can be carried back, however that should be
limited to its recoverable amount.
The revaluation model: Under the revaluation model,
property, plant and equipment is carried at fair value less any subsequent
accumulated depreciation. The market value of land and building usually
represent their fair value. If there is no reliable market value (for example,
because the asset is specialised or because sales are rare), depreciated replacement
cost can be used.
According to IAS 16 revaluation test should be carried out
annually. And if there is any revaluation indication asset should be revalued
immediately. Revaluation model is available only if the fair value of the item
can be measured reliably. Where there is no market value available, depreciated
replacement amount should be used.
If the revalued amount is more than the carrying value of
the asset at the time of the revaluation, there is a revaluation gain. If the
revalued amount is lower than the carrying amount, there is a revaluation loss.
• If a revaluation increases the value of an asset, the
increase is presented as other comprehensive income (and disclosed as an item
that will not be recycled to profit or loss in subsequent periods) and held in
a 'revaluation surplus' within other components of equity.
• Any loss on revaluation is included in profit or loss, as
a loss in the period, unless the loss reverses a previous revaluation gain. In
this case, the loss is reported in other comprehensive income and set off
against the gain in the revaluation reserve, and is not reported through profit
or loss.
If the revaluation model is adopted, then IAS 16 provides
the following rules:
• Revaluations must be made with ‘sufficient regularity’ to
ensure that the carrying amount does not differ materially from the fair value
at each reporting date but IAS 16 does not define any fixed intervals for
revaluations.
• If an item is revalued, the entire class of assets to
which the item belongs must be revalued. A class would usually be defined as land
and buildings, or machinery, or fixtures and fittings. Generally, companies choose
to revalue land and buildings whilst using the cost model for all other classes
of assets.
• Increase in value which represent initial impairment
should initially be offset with expenses deducting excess depreciation and
remaining amount credited to revaluation surplus.
Valuation should normally be performed by a professionally
qualified valuer.
Example: An asset was purchased for $500,000, and was
believed to have a useful economic life of ten years and no residual
value. At the end of year 8 the asset is revalued and found to have a
fair value of $150,000.
Required: Explain the accounting treatment of the
revaluation and the subsequent depreciation of the asset.
Answer: At the date of revaluation, but before the
revaluation is made, the asset is stated in the statement of financial
position as follows:
|
$000
|
Cost
|
500
|
Accumulated depreciation (500/10) × 8 years
|
(400)
|
Net book value
|
100
|
There are three elements to dealing with a revaluation:
• The asset cost must be adjusted to its revalued amount
• The accumulated depreciation must be eliminated
• The increase in the carrying value of the asset is taken
directly to the revaluation reserve in equity.
The double entry will therefore be as follows:
|
$000
|
$000
|
CR Asset (500 – 150)
|
|
350
|
DR Accumulated depreciation
|
400
|
|
CR Revaluation reserve
|
|
50
|
These adjustments will alter the carrying value of the asset
to $150,000 (from $100,000), accumulated depreciation is $0 and the revaluation
reserve for the asset is increased by $50,000.
Depreciation after revaluation: Depreciation charges
after revaluation, for inclusion in profit or loss, must be based on the
revised value (= revalued amount).
In the example above, the $150,000 carrying value will be
depreciated over its remaining life of two years, at $75,000 per year. This
will be the depreciation charge each year in profit or loss.
An annual reserve transfer may be made each year from the
revaluation reserve directly to accumulated profits, for the difference between
depreciation based on historical cost and depreciation on the revalued amount.
This transfer is made directly between the reserves and is not reported in
profit or loss:
|
$
|
Depreciation based on historical cost ($500,000/10 years)
|
50,000
|
Depreciation based on the revalued amount
|
75,000
|
Transfer from revaluation reserve to accumulated profit
(for the excess depreciation charge)
|
25,000
|
In this example, the effect after two years is that the
asset will be fully depreciated and the balance on the revaluation reserve for
the asset will have been reduced to $0.
Revaluations using an index: An alternative way of
expressing the change in the asset’s value is to use a cost index or
price index. Using the above example, and an index of 150 for the revaluation,
the revaluation could instead be recorded as follows:
|
Original Value
|
Index
|
Revalued
|
Cost
|
$500,000
|
150%
|
$750,000
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
$400,000
|
150%
|
$600,000
|
Net book value
|
$100,000
|
150%
|
$150,000
|
As the net book value has increased, it is assumed that the
replacement cost of the asset has increased. The cost is therefore adjusted,
together with the accumulated depreciation. The journal entry to record this
adjustment should be:
|
$000
|
$000
|
DR Cost
|
250,000
|
|
CR Accumulated depreciation
|
|
200,000
|
CR Revaluation reserve
|
|
50,000
|
Revaluation losses: A revaluation may indicate that
an asset has dropped in value rather than increased. The accounting
treatment is exactly the same as for the treatment of impairment.
There are four cases in revaluation model:
(1)
Increase in value of asset
(2)
Decrease in value of asset
(3)
Initially increase in value of asset then decrease
in value of asset
(4)
Initially decrease in value of asset then
increase in value of asset
(1) Increase in value of asset
Dr. Property, plant and equipment
Cr. Revaluation surplus (Other comprehensive income)
Or
• Dr Non-current asset cost (difference between valuation
and original cost/valuation)
• Dr Accumulated depreciation (with any historical cost
accumulated depreciation)
• Cr Revaluation reserve (gain on revaluation)
Example: Plant value on 1 January 2010 = $50,000
Life = 5 years,
1 January 2012
revalued to $60,000
So Depreciation = $50,000/5 = $10,000 p.a.
Net Book Value as on 31st December 2011 = $30,000
($50,000 - $20,000).
Entries:
• Dr Non-current asset cost (difference between valuation
and original cost/valuation): $10,000 ($60,000 - $50,000).
• Dr Accumulated depreciation (with any historical cost
accumulated depreciation): $20,000
• Cr Revaluation reserve (gain on revaluation): $30,000
Example: On 1st
January 2010 land was bought for $1000 and at 31st Dec 2010 it
upward revalued to 1500.
Answer: 1st January2010:
Asset Dr: 1000
Cash Cr: 1000
31st December 2010:
Asset Dr: 500
Revaluation reserve Cr: 500 (Revaluation reserve is equity
component)
(2) Decrease in value of asset
Dr. Expenses (P/L)
Cr. Property, plant and equipment
Example 2: Land was bought on 1st January 2010
for $1000 and on 31st December it downward valued to $750.
Answer: 1st January 2010
Asset Dr: 1000
Cash Cr: 1000
31st December 2010:
P&L Dr: 250
Asset Cr: 250
(3) Initially increase in value of asset then decrease in
value of asset
• Dr Revaluation reserve (to maximum of original gain)
• Dr Income statement (any residual loss)
• Cr Non-current asset (loss on revaluation)
Examples: Purchase price of asset = 100 million
Date of purchase = 1 January 20X1
Life = 10 years
Revalued at 31 January 20X1 = 120 million
Revalued at 31 December 20X2 = 50 million.
Solution: Carrying value of asset on 31 December 20X1
= 100 million – Depreciation
= 100 million – 10 million = 90 million
Revalued to 120 million so gain on revaluation = 30 million
On 20X2: Before depreciation = 120 million
Depreciation = 120/9 = 13.3
After depreciation = 106.7 (120 – 13.3)
Revalued to 50 million so decrease in value = 56.7 (106.7 –
50)
Journal entries
Dr. Revaluation surplus = 30 (Whole amount of revaluation
surplus)
Dr. Expenses = 26.7
Cr. Property, plant and equipment = 56.7
Example: On 1st January 2010 land was
bought for $1000 on 31 December 2010 it was got revalued to $1500 and on 31st
December 2011 it got revalued to 750.
Answer: 1st January 2010
Asset Dr: 1000
Cash Cr: 1000
31 December 2010:
Asset Dr: 500
Rev Res Cr: 500
31st Dec 2011:
P&L Dr: 250
Rev Res Dr: 500
Asset Cr: 750
(4) Initially decrease in value of asset then increase in
value of asset
Examples: Purchase price of asset = 100 million
Date of purchase = 1 January 20X1
Life = 10 years
Revalued at 31 January 20X1 = 70 million
Revalued at 31 December 20X2 = 120 million.
Solution: Carrying value of asset on 31 December 20X1
= 100 million – Depreciation
= 100 million – 10 million = 90 million
Revalued to 70 million so loss on revaluation = 20 million
On 20X2: Before depreciation = 70 million
Depreciation = 70/9 = 7.7
After depreciation = 62.3 (70 – 7.7)
Revalued to 120 million so increase in value = 57.7 (120 –
62.3)
Journal entries:
Dr. Revaluation surplus = 57.7
Dr. Expenses = 17.7(Remaining life 20/9*8)
Cr. Revaluation surplus = 40
Example: Land was bought for $1000 on 1st
January2010 it revalued downward on 31st December 2010 to $750 and
on 31 December 2011 it got upward revalued to 31st December 2011.
Answer: 1st Jan 2010
Asset Dr: 1000
Cash Cr: 1000
31st Dec 2010:
P&L Dr: 250
Asset Cr: 250
31st Dec 2011:
Asset Dr: 750
P&L Cr: 250
Rev.Res Cr: 500
Example: Revaluation and Depreciation: CoCo Company
bought an asset for $10000 at the beginning of 2005. It had a useful life of
five years. On 1st January 2007 the asset was revalued to $12000.
The asset life is remain unchanged i.e. three years remain.
Account for revaluation and state treatment for depreciation
from 2008 onwards.
Answer
On 1st January 2007 the carrying value of the
asset is:
10000/5=2000 per year depreciation
Two year depreciation 2000 x 2= 4000
Asset carrying value = 6000
Acc. Depreciation Dr: 4000
Asset Dr: 2000
Revaluation Reserve Cr: 6000
Depreciation for next three years will be 12000/3=4000,
compared to depreciation on cost extra $2000 can be treated as part of surplus
Revaluation Surplus Dr: 2000
Retain earning Cr: 2000
Complex Asset: Asset which has more than one
component and every component has different useful life. For example assets
like Aircraft, Ships, Train etc has different components and their life is
different such assets are known as complex Asset.
Subsequent expenditure: Subsequent expenditure can be
capitalised if it meets recognition criteria. Overhaul expenditure can be
capitalised and should be depreciated till next overhaul. Such costs which
incurred during the life of the asset and due to them:
1. It increases the efficiency of the asset
2. It increases the useful life of the asset or
3. It decreases the operating cost of the asset.
These costs need to capitalise in the cost of the asset and
such expenditures are known as subsequent expenditure. Where a part of an asset
(a ‘component’) is replaced, the cost of the replacement should be capitalised
and the net book value of the component replaced should be removed from the statement
of financial position.
Example: Aircrafts interiors require replacement at regular
intervals.
Example: A shipping company is required to put its
ships into dry dock every three years for an overhaul, at a cost of
$300,000. The ships have a useful life of 20 years. A ship is purchased
from a shipbuilder at a cost of $20 million.
When the ship is first acquired, $300,000 of the asset cost
should be treated as a separate component and depreciated over three years. The
rest of the cost of the ship ($19.7 million) should be depreciated over 20
years. By the end of the third year an overhaul will be required. The cost of
the overhaul is capitalised and added to the asset’s cost. The cost ($300,000)
and accumulated depreciation of the depreciated component is removed from the
accounts.
Example: A building is constructed. The cost of the
building includes the cost of the main construction work, plus the costs
of air conditioning, the cost of elevators and the cost of wall
partitions.
The cost of the building should be allocated between
component elements, and each component element should be depreciated
separately. For example, the cost of the elevators should be capitalised and
depreciated over their expected useful life. When the elevators are replaced
(whenever this actually happens), the cost of the new elevators should be
capitalised and included in the cost of the building. The net book value of the
old elevators should be taken out of the carrying value of the building and
written off (unless they have a disposal value).
Depreciation: Depreciation is systematic
allocation of cost over its useful life and it should be charged to depreciable
asset only. Depreciation does not measure the change in the value of a
non-current asset. It is simply an accounting method for allocating the cost of
an asset to profit or loss over the asset’s expected useful life. The
depreciation charge has the effect of spreading the cost/fair value of the
asset over the periods that will benefit from its use. All tangible non-current
assets must be depreciated. The only exception to this rule is land, which
normally has an indefinite useful life (unless it is used in mining or similar
industries).
Dr. Depreciation
Cr. PPE/Accumulated Depreciation
Charged to Cost of goods sold (COGS) is question is
silent.
Depreciation methods based on the revenue generated by an
activity are not appropriate. This is because revenue reflects many factors,
such as inflation, sales prices and sales volumes, rather than the economic
consumption of an asset. In practice, many entities depreciate property, plant
and equipment on a straight line basis over its estimated useful economic life.
While considering depreciation method, company should
consider factors like expected physical wear and tear, legal or other
relevance, past and similar nature industry method and revenue generation from
assets.
The residual value and the useful life, depreciation method,
depreciation rate and pattern of consumption of benefit of an asset should be
reviewed at least at each financial year-end and revised if necessary. If
expectation differ from previous estimates it is change in accounting estimates
are accounted for as a change in accounting estimate (under IAS 8
Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors), rather
than as a change in accounting policy. This means that they are reflected in
the current and future statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
Residual value is likely to me immaterial in most of the
case. However, when the amount is significant, the value must be estimated and
should be based on current situation.
IAs 16 does not prescribe the depreciation method but it
should reflect the pattern in which economic benefit of asset is consumed by
the entity.
Depreciation begins when the asset is available for use and
continues until the asset is derecognised, even if it is idle.
The depreciation charge on the revalued asset will be
different to the depreciation that would have been charged based on the
historical cost of the asset. As a result of this, IAS 16 permits a transfer to
be made of an amount equal to the excess depreciation from the revaluation
reserve to retained earnings.
Double entry:
• Dr Revaluation reserve
• Cr Retained earnings
Note: Building being constructed is shown as Capital Work
in Progress.
Depreciation of separate components: Component of
asset with differing pattern of benefits are depreciated differently.
Even regular overhauls occur in order to continue operation,
the cost of overhaul should be treated as additional component and depreciate
over the period of next overhaul.
If asset is measured at historical cost depreciation charged
is based on historical cost and if asset are measured at revalued amount the
depreciation charged should be based on revalued amount.
Example: An asset is purchased for $200,000 and is
believed to have a useful life to the company of five years before it is
scrapped for an expected $50,000.
Required
(a) Calculate the annual depreciation charge.
(b) At the start of the third year, the company restructures
its operations and as a result the total asset life is believed to be only four
years, with the residual value unchanged. Explain the impact on the
depreciation expense.
Answer
(a) Annual depreciation:
=
=$30,000 per annum.
(b) If estimates are revised, the carrying value of the
asset at the date of the new assessment should be written off over its
remaining expected life, using the new estimates. The new remaining expected
life is two years. The change in estimate is not applied retrospectively. A
prior year adjustment must not be made when dealing with the revision of an
estimate.
Net book value at the start of year 3 = $200,000 – (2 years
× $30,000) = $140,000
This net book value will be written off over the remaining
useful life of 2 years.
Revised depreciation =
= $45, 000 per year
Depreciation and components of non-current assets: A non-current asset may have several components.
For example, a property has two elements, the land and
the buildings. IAS 16 requires that the land and building element must
be treated as separate assets.
• The land element is (usually) not depreciated as it has an
indefinite useful life.
• The building must be depreciated, even if its value has
increased, as it does have a finite useful life.
• However, if the expected residual value of a building is
expected to equal or exceed the cost, then depreciation will be zero as there
is no ‘depreciable cost’ to the company.
Some assets contain several components with very different
useful lives. For example an aeroplane consists of the external structure, the
avionics system, engine and cabin interior. Depreciation must therefore be
calculated on each of these components over their individual useful lives,
using their individual residual values.
Derecognition: IAS 16 says that an asset should be
derecognised (its carrying amount is removed from the statement of financial
position) when disposal occurs, when the life of asset is completed or if no
further economic benefits are expected from the asset's use or disposal. In addition,
it should be derecognised when it is transferred as held for sale under IFRS 5.
Entity has routinely sale item of Property, plant and
equipment that have previously held for rental or other purposes should
transfer to inventory at carrying value. Conversely, if inventories are
transferred from stock to Property, plant and equipment, if they are used as
per the definition of IAS 16.
If an entity rents some assets and then ceases to rent them,
the assets should be transferred to inventories at their carrying amounts as
they become held for sale in the ordinary course of business.
Gain or loss on derecognition is charged to Profit and Loss.
The gain or loss on derecognition of an asset is the difference between the
net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the item.
The gain or loss on the disposal is calculated as:
|
$
|
Net disposal proceeds
|
X
|
Minus: Carrying amount
|
(X)
|
Gain/(loss) on disposal
|
X/(X)
|
IAS 16 does not allow the gain on disposal to be included in
the revenue line of the statement of profit or loss, but it does not specify
where it should be shown. It simply states: ‘The gain or loss arising from
derecognition of an item of property, plant and equipment shall be included in
profit when the item is derecognised…Gains shall not be classified as revenue.’
Disposal of a revalued asset: On disposal of a
revalued asset it must be remembered that the revaluation gain has already
been recognised in the revaluation reserve. Therefore the gain on disposal is
calculated based on the revalued carrying value.
Any balance on the revaluation reserve relating to an asset
that has been disposed of should be transferred directly to the retained
earnings, or it may be left in the revaluation surplus within other components
of equity.
• Dr Revaluation reserve
• Cr Retained earnings
It is not permitted to release the revaluation reserve to
profit or loss for the year in which the asset is disposed of. This practice is
called ‘recycling’ and is not permitted by IAS 16.
Example: On 1 April Year 1, a company buys an asset
with an expected life of 20 years. By the end of 31 March Year 5, the
carrying value is as follows:
|
$
|
Cost
|
180,000
|
Accumulated depreciation (4 years × $9,000)
|
(36,000)
|
Net book value
|
144,000
|
The asset is revalued to $200,000 on 1 April Year 5,
resulting in a gain on revaluation. The gain of $56,000 ($200,000 – $144,000)
is credited to the revaluation reserve on this date. On 1 April Year 7, the
asset is sold for $229,000.
The financial year of the company ends on 31st March.
After the revaluation, annual depreciation is based on the
revalued amount of the asset ($200,000) and its remaining useful life (16
years). The annual depreciation charge is therefore $12,500, which is $3,500
higher than the depreciation charge based on the historical cost of the asset.
Required: How should the disposal be accounted for?
Answer: The disposal on 1 April Year 7 would be
recorded as follows:
(a) Carrying amount prior to disposal on 1 April Year 7
|
$
|
Machinery at valuation at 1 April Year 7
|
200,000
|
Accumulated depreciation ($200,000 /16 years) × 2 yrs.
|
(25,000)
|
Net book value
|
175,000
|
(b) Revaluation reserve: On 1 April Year 5, when the
asset was revalued, the revaluation reserve was $56,000. The company is
allowed to make a reserve transfer each year following revaluation for
the amount of the additional depreciation arising from the revaluation.
The historical cost of depreciation was $9,000 per annum,
and the revised depreciation is $12,500. Therefore over the past two years
since the revaluation, the entity will have transferred $3,500 each year from
the revaluation reserve to accumulated profits, to offset the additional depreciation
effect on profit or loss.
The revaluation reserve at 1 April Year 7 is therefore
$56,000 – (2 years × $3,500) = $49,000.
(c) Profit on disposal – included in profit or loss
for year to 31 March Year 8.
|
$
|
Sale proceeds
|
229,000
|
Minus: Net book value on disposal
|
( 175,000)
|
Profit on disposal
|
54,000
|
(d) Other comprehensive income for year to 31 March Year 8
and transfer from revaluation reserve to retained earnings reserve on 1 April
Year 7.
|
Revaluation
reserve
$
|
Retained
earnings
$
|
At 1 April Year 7
|
49,000
|
X
|
Transfer on disposal of non-current asset
|
(49,000)
|
49,000
|
At 31 March Year 8
|
0
|
Y
|
Disclosure requirements: Information about each class
of property, plant and equipment
For each class of property, plant, and equipment, disclose:
• Basis for measuring carrying amount
• Depreciation method(s)
• Used useful lives or depreciation rates
• Gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses
• Reconciliation of the carrying amount at the beginning and
the end of the period, showing:
¾
Additions
¾
Disposals
¾
Acquisitions through business combinations
¾
Revaluation increases or decreases
¾
Impairment losses
¾
Reversals of impairment losses
¾
Depreciation
¾
Net foreign exchange differences on translation
¾
Other movements
Additional disclosures: The following disclosures are
also required:
• Restrictions on title and items pledged as security for
liabilities
• Expenditures to construct property, plant, and equipment
during the period
• Contractual commitments to acquire property, plant, and
equipment
• Compensation from third parties for items of property,
plant, and equipment that were impaired, lost or given up that is included in
profit or loss.
IAS 16 also encourages, but does not require, a number of
additional disclosures.
Revalued property, plant and equipment: If property,
plant, and equipment is stated at revalued amounts, certain additional
disclosures are required:
• The effective date of the revaluation
• Whether an independent valuer was involved
• For each revalued class of property, the carrying amount
that would have been recognised had the assets been carried under the cost
model
• The revaluation surplus, including changes during the
period and any restrictions on the distribution of the balance to shareholders.
Entities with property, plant and equipment stated at
revalued amounts are also required to make disclosures under IFRS 13 Fair Value
Measurement.
Illustration: Change in depreciation estimates: An
asset was purchased for $100,000 on 1 January 20X5 and straight line
depreciation of $20,000 per annum was charged (five year life, no residual
value). A general review of asset lives was undertaken and the remaining useful
life of this asset as at 1 January 20X7 was deemed to be eight years.
Required: What is the annual depreciation charge for 20X7
and subsequent years?
Solution:
Carrying amount as at 1 January 20X7 (3/5 × $100,000): $60,000
Remaining useful life as at 1 January 20X7: 8 years
Annual depreciation charge ($60,000/8 years): $7,500
Depreciation of separate components: Certain large
assets are in fact a collection of smaller assets, each with a different cost
and useful life. For example, an aeroplane consists of an airframe (which may
last for 40 years or so) plus engines, radar equipment, seats, etc. all of
which have a relatively short life. Instead of calculating depreciation on the
aeroplane as a whole, depreciation is charged on each component (airframe,
engines, etc.).
For example, an entity buys a ship for $12m. The ship as a
whole should last for 25 years. The engines, however, will need replacing after
7 years. The cost price of $12m included about $1.4m in respect of the engines.
The annual depreciation charge will be $624,000 made up as
follows:
Engines: $1.4m over seven years = $200,000 pa, plus
The rest of the ship: $10.6m over 25 years = $424,000 pa.
The impact on the financial statements: IAS 16
Property, Plant and Equipment permits entities to use a cost model or a
revaluation model. This choice will have a big impact on the financial
statements.
Example: Entities A and B are identical in all
respects, except for their accounting policy for property, plant and
equipment.
Both entities purchased an asset four years ago for
$200,000. This was deemed to have a useful economic life of 10 years. Its fair
value at the start of the current reporting period was $350,000.
Entity A uses the cost model. The current year depreciation
charge on the asset is $20,000 ($200,000/10). The carrying amount of the asset
in the statement of financial position at the year-end is $120,000 (6/10 × $200,000).
Entity B uses the revaluation model. The asset was revalued
at the start of the year by $210,000 ($350,000 – (7/10 × $200,000)). The
depreciation charge on the asset in the current year is $50,000 ($350,000/7).
The asset has a carrying amount in the statement of financial position of $300,000
($350,000 – $50,000).
Extracts from the financial statements of both entities are
provided below:
Statement of profit or loss
|
A
$000
|
B
$000
|
Revenue
|
220
|
220
|
Operating costs
|
(180)
|
(210)
|
Profit from operations
|
40
|
10
|
Statement of financial position
|
A
$000
|
B
$000
|
Share capital
|
50
|
50
|
Retained earnings
|
90
|
60
|
Other components of equity
|
–
|
210
|
Total equity
|
140
|
320
|
Borrowings
|
100
|
100
|
Total equity and liabilities
|
240
|
420
|
Operating profit margin
|
18.2%
|
4.5%
|
Return on capital employed
|
16.7%
|
2.4%
|
Gearing (debt/debt + equity)
|
41.7%
|
23.8%
|
Entity B's upwards revaluation has increased equity in the
statement of financial position. This reduces its ROCE, making entity B appear
less efficient than entity A. However it also means that entity B's gearing is lower
than entity A's, making it seem like a less risky investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment